Victor C90 II review: wide last, heavy stability, flagship cushion
Victor's release cadence is relentless — 9200 CX had barely settled when C90 II landed as the next flagship.
Disclosure: Some outbound retailer links may be affiliate links. They never change editorial order or fit scores. Affiliate policy
Jump to section (5)
Overview
Victor's release cadence is relentless — 9200 CX had barely settled when C90 II landed as the next flagship. I have worn coffee, white, night black, and the holographic copper colourways across sessions; large synthetic panels with silver accents read mature and serious. Teammates still do a double-take on the copper holographic build — the shoe looks like it borrowed a supercar grille and decided to play badminton. On paper the stack is absurd: supercritical nitrogen foam plus HYPEREVA, TPU overlays, a full split-toe carbon plate 2.0, and the largest L-S.S. lateral brace I have worn — plus NEO DYPLEX 2.0 dual-density midsole, Energy Pad / ENERGYMAX 3.0 insole, double-layer toe treatment, and a U2.5 / 2.5U wide last (3E width, toe box opened internally). That last point matters: heavier, wider feet get real room. EU 41 units I weighed sat around 348–364 g depending on colourway and how the scale was set up — still light for a wide, stability-first shoe. Stack heights versus C90NL: forefoot roughly 12 → 15 mm, heel roughly 17 → 23 mm. More foam without turning the shoe into a trampoline is the design brief. The dual-density midsole 2.0 stacks soft supercritical comfort on top of springy HYPEREVA underneath; the split-toe plate now covers a bigger arch-to-forefoot patch than the first C90, and the L-S.S. brace is longer than on C90NL with extra TPU at the heel and midfoot.
Fit and lockdown
Upper wraps the foot cleanly in movement. One-piece microfibre PU, toe abrasion film, and dual-layer mesh make the shell stiff in a good way — ankle padding is thick; I could chase corners without worrying about rolling out. Lace layout improves top-eye lockdown, though the first lace-up takes a bit of patience. Wrap ranks among the best I have tested. Match internal length to foot length: a 250 mm foot sat well in EU 40 (about 255 mm internal); EU 41 internals around 265 mm felt honest, not ocean-wide. The last is labelled U but sits in a U-to-V transition — wider than a classic Victor V last, roughly a step past P9200 CX, without going "wide as a lake."
Grip, cushion, torsion
VSR rubber and a busy outsole pattern — grip is never a question in any direction I tried. No separate outsole TPU brace: Victor trusts the elongated L-S.S. plus the split-toe plate. In hard lateral cuts the brace edge almost "stops and holds" the foot; the first few sessions feel unfamiliar, then the lock becomes confidence. HYPEREVA plus nitrogen foam feels springy but stable: impact is absorbed, rebound is quick, steps link smoothly. Static standing can feel firmer than the thick midsole suggests — the stability frame covers the soft sink you expect from a cushion shoe. Once you move, free landings show soft centre cushion with firm outer walls. At about 70 kg body weight, landing cushion felt maxed; heavier players should still find this friendly. Toe press loads the plate and you get a direct push-off, not a soggy delay. The forward rock is milder than early C90 generations — still a slight launch bias without the old "always on tiptoes" feel. The side-to-side L-S.S. plate is the headline — high-strength TPU with carbon backup. I could not twist the midfoot by hand; in play, roll and deformation stay near zero. Single-leg landings after overhead interceptions and quick recovery after rear-court chops felt safer than on thinner cushion shoes I have worn. Arch fascia fatigue after long sessions is lower than on first-gen C90 for me — the plate actually helps instead of just stiffening the ride.
Durability and breathability
Toe V-Durable+ film (flagship-only coating plus dense film) flexes without cracking — thin, not a chunky dump of rubber. Not as thick as 9200's anti-abrasion layer, but meatier than 970's film. VSR outsole rubber is thick; I would not baby it. Breathability is why I stop short of a 90+ score: summer three-hour sessions ran hot. PU and abrasion film dominate the upper despite vent holes. Other seasons should be fine.
Verdict
C90 II is a complete flagship stability shoe — layered looks, deep cushion, reinforced torsion, excellent wrap, and a wide last that flatters big feet. It breaks the old cushion-versus-start trade-off better than most protection shoes I have worn. Give it a few sessions if the first static feel seems stern; the on-court ride is the point. If you want maximum lateral armour with modern foam and can tolerate warm feet in peak summer, this belongs on your try list.
Was this article helpful?
Your vote helps us prioritize the next editorial sweep.
Keep reading
Best wide-feet badminton shoes
Six picks with wide or wide-available lasts ranked by stability and cushioning.
Read →
Wide feet badminton shoes guide
How to size wide lasts, what to avoid, and when to size up instead.
Read →
Badminton shoes vs running shoes
Why lateral stability and court rubber matter more than running-shoe cushioning.
Read →