Mizuno Carbo Pro 825 review: the softer, stickier sibling to the 823
A 4U/G5 (about 94g, 300mm balance, mid-low stiffness, fluid box frame, 72 holes, strung around 24 lb). Not the 'balanced' racket forums claim, but a less-extreme base attacker that is friendlier than the 823.
Disclosure: Some outbound retailer links may be affiliate links. They never change editorial order or fit scores. Affiliate policy
Jump to section (5)
Placing the 825 in the Carbo Pro line
I rounds off the regular-channel Carbo Pro range with the 825, and corrects a common assumption: it is not the same racket as the 823, and the differences are not small. The forum label of a balanced racket overstates it; I pegs it as a not-overly-extreme base attacking frame rather than a true all-rounder. It is also awkward to buy, with clearance channels often bundling it in pairs. As with the rest of this batch the specifications are community-reported, since Mizuno does not publish detailed English data for the model, but the on-court read is consistent and useful.
Looks and build
The 825 keeps the line's signature styling, an Astrox-like asymmetric split with black up top and orange below, so close to the 823 in some promotional shots that I initially mistook the two box-frame rackets for one model. Whatever the colour, the series carries a more premium visual presence than most budget frames, which is a real part of its appeal at the price. Under the paint sits a 4U/G5 build at about 94 grams in use, a 300mm balance, a 218mm mid-low-stiffness shaft, a thinner, rounder fluid box-section frame, a 72-hole bed, 9-to-3 grooves, a 28 lb warranty and a modest strung tension.
Easier to use than the 823
The headline improvement is accessibility. The 825's onboarding sits near the 829 and is easier than the 823: swing weight is still on the high side, but the thinner, rounder fluid box frame and a slightly lower overall stiffness noticeably cut the power impedance. With the same borrowed-power feel and the same unremarkable factory string, clears take less load and the release feels more agreeable, without the off-putting effort the 823 can demand. Frame stability is not sacrificed for that ease either, holding placement well through long, slow rallies, so the friendlier feel does not come at the cost of control.
Hold-on-ball control and a string caveat
The fluid frame runs a slightly lower stringbed tension, giving a stronger hold-on-ball feel than both the 823 and 829, a stickier, more cushioned contact. That cuts both ways: at the net the heavy de-powering can over-soften touch shots, so I advises swapping in a firmer, livelier string and adapting to less push and more pop. The upside is excellent wrap-and-slice behaviour and a dependable sweet-spot area, making steep slice drops easy from the rear court along a natural downward flight, though confidence on the release dips slightly because the soft contact leaves you wondering if the shuttle cleared the net.
Attack, defence and the verdict
Attack is sound rather than spectacular: the longer hold transmits swing power more fully into the shuttle, the natural downward bias helps, and a slightly lower-drag frame gives advancing players usable burst with good in-class power. Rear-court continuity beats the 823, and passive shuttles and smash defence feel more trustworthy under pressure. The clear weakness is front-court flat drives, where the green 829 with its aero frame remains the line's best. I ends up genuinely liking the 825 for its looks, feel and everyday match needs: restring it and it suits most male players across levels, and at this price the brand and finish alone justify the spend.
Was this article helpful?
Your vote helps us prioritize the next editorial sweep.