Skip to main content
IntoBadminton

Yonex Astrox 88D Pro vs Li-Ning AxForce 90 New

Two rear-court doubles attack flagships. The 88D Pro 2024 is Yonex's tour-tested rear-court hammer; the AxForce 90 New is Li-Ning's most aggressive answer to it.

By Rui Su · Founder, IntoBadminton · Div 4 Ireland · trained under former Malaysia national and China provincial-team coachesLast reviewed

Both rackets target the same player: men's doubles rear court, smash-heavy. They feel different in the hand and they reward different swing patterns. The honest decision is rarely brand — it is whether you swing through the contact zone (88D Pro) or stack power at the top of the stroke (AxForce 90 New).

Product A · Yonex

Astrox 88D Pro

Men's doubles rear-court attack, smash specialists

~$240

  • ·2024 generation: new Namd Flex Force shaft, Power Assist Bumper, 10mm built-in T-joint
  • ·4U samples: ~84g unstrung, balance 305–308mm (BadmintonCN community measurements)
  • ·Stiff shaft, head-heavy
  • ·Stringing advice 4U: 20–28 lb (Yonex official 88 Pro line)
  • ·Pro-tour tested via Indonesian men's doubles pairs

Product B · Li-Ning

AxForce 90 New

Men's doubles rear-court attack, ex-Halbertec players

~$210

  • ·Li-Ning AxForce attack family flagship update
  • ·BadmintonCN-sourced spec, no Li-Ning product-specific page verification
  • ·Stiff shaft, head-heavy
  • ·Slightly heavier feel through swing path than 88D Pro
  • ·Strongest in Asia-Pacific resale; thinner elsewhere
FactorYonex Astrox 88D ProLi-Ning AxForce 90 New
Source authorityBadmintonCN spec (Yonex 88 Pro line page verified separately)Edge: ABadmintonCN spec only
Head balanceTieHead-heavy (~305–308mm 4U)Head-heavy (~304mm 4U)
Shaft hardness (YuanShi independent rig)Tie~7.59~7.65
Swing characterTieCleaner rotational, faster snapbackHeavier feel at contact, more dwell
First-attack smashTieExcellentExcellent
Continuous attack staminaBetter (faster shaft unload)Edge: AMore demanding
Best amateur ROIMore forgiving on imperfect timingEdge: ARewards conditioned rear-court timing
Indicative price (USD)~$240~$210Edge: B

If you're choosing your rear-court doubles attack racket and the 88D Pro is in budget, the lower source-authority confidence on the Li-Ning row is the real tiebreaker. IntoBadminton's source policy downgrades AxForce 90 New until Li-Ning publishes a product-specific page — that does not mean the racket is worse, but it does mean published specs are community-sourced.

When the Astrox 88D Pro is the right answer

Buy the Astrox 88D Pro 2024 if you play men's doubles rear-court and your match-winning shot is the smash, if you want Yonex's pro-tour-validated platform, and if you value the faster shaft snapback for continuous attack patterns. The 2024 generation specifically tightens the timing window — better than the camel-gold predecessor for amateurs who play long rallies.

When the AxForce 90 New is the right answer

Buy the AxForce 90 New if you already play Li-Ning's AxForce line, if you specifically prefer the heavier dwell-time feel at contact, or if budget pressure pushes you toward the slightly cheaper option. Li-Ning's AxForce 90 New is a real attack frame — the source-authority caveat is about Li-Ning's publishing posture, not racket quality.

I've hit with both at club level. The 88D Pro 2024 is the more amateur-friendly of the two — its shaft unloads faster, which protects you over long rallies. The AxForce 90 New rewards conditioned timing on first attack but punishes mid-rally fatigue harder. For most Division 3–4 amateur players I would lean 88D Pro; for league players with conditioned smash mechanics, either works.

Rui Su · Founder, IntoBadminton · Div 4 Ireland · trained under former Malaysia national and China provincial-team coaches.

Related guides

Compare them through your profile

Run the finder. Five questions; we'll rank both rackets — and everything else in the catalogue — against your level, role, body, and budget.

Start the finder

Privacy-first cookie choices

We use necessary local storage for the finder. Analytics and ads are optional and are off by default under our strict global baseline. Ads remain operationally disabled until a compliant consent platform is configured.